>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
James> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 16:34 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
James> We could try using this as the trigger. I assume all DIF
James> supporting devices must also claim conformance to SPC3/SBC2 or
James> higher?
You'd think, wouldn't you?
Originally I only checked for PROTECT if version was SBC2 or better.
But as it turns out I have drives that only report SBC and yet they do
DIF. This old version is apparently reported to prevent problems in
other operating systems.
*sigh*
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--