Hi, On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:Hm? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. Do you think the credit is undeserved? Oh right. I believed that Bryan Wu is the maintainer who would eventually apply the patch, therefore I put him as a direct recipient of the e-mail (To-field) and that he would add his Signed-off-by line which would make the Cc-line redundant. I guess it makes some sense to also list the maintainer in the patch Ccs since the patch itself may be separate from the raw e-mail (e.g. in mail archives, which generally don't display To: or Cc: fields). I didn't realize this before. Thanks. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 --
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Ulrich Drepper | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Washington Odhiambo | Weird Problem with NAT - more details |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
