Re: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 - 4:28 am

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:

Hm? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. Do you think
the credit is undeserved?


Oh right. I believed that Bryan Wu is the maintainer who would
eventually apply the patch, therefore I put him as a direct recipient
of the e-mail (To-field) and that he would add his Signed-off-by line
which would make the Cc-line redundant. I guess it makes some sense to
also list the maintainer in the patch Ccs since the patch itself may
be separate from the raw e-mail (e.g. in mail archives, which
generally don't display To: or Cc: fields). I didn't realize this
before.

Thanks.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags, Vegard Nossum, (Wed Aug 6, 3:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags, Vegard Nossum, (Wed Aug 6, 4:28 am)