Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, <malware-list@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 11:52 pm

> I didn't consider it.  Most likely at the end of the day the finding

This means your scheme is not generally supposed to protect against root? 

I assume yes (since I can think of lots of other holes for 
root), but you should state that explicitely in the spec since it
is a major limitation.

On the other hand it will also allow you to optimize significantly:

In particularly it also means that you can trust the permissions
and don't need to check any files which cannot be written by users 
you don't control.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on acce..., Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 5, 11:52 pm)
Sidebar to [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 7:40 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfa..., David Collier-Brown, (Mon Aug 11, 12:11 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfa..., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Aug 13, 10:28 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interf..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 7:31 am)