On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:Alas, we've been here before. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/608634 On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Al Viro wrote: > Incidentally, I would really love to see the threat profile we are > talking about. Exactly. Please come up with a set of requirements that can be reviewed by the core kernel folk, and perhaps then focus on how to meet those requirements once they have been accepted. To be very clear, so we don't waste any _more_ time and effort on this: The anti-malware folk need to first provide a clearly understandable and complete description of the problem including a characterization of the threat. The next step is to propose a design which addresses the problem, and to clearly and completely demonstrate how it does so. Only then will it be possible to conduct an informed discussion on the underlying case for malware scanning and its possible implementation. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> --
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10919] [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
