Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfaceforon access scanning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 5:51 pm

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:38:23 -0400
"Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@ca.com> wrote:


How can you, as a security professional, argue for a security measure
that you know is flawed, when there is a mailing list full of people
willing to help figure out what a working security measure would look
like?

Yes, abandoning some of the old DOS anti-virus security model may
cause work, but surely that will be worth it if it leads to a more
secure system?

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinter ..., Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 5, 5:51 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux inte ..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 4:31 am)
Sidebar to [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a lin ..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 4:40 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinter ..., David Collier-Brown, (Mon Aug 11, 9:11 am)