Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfaceforon access scanning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Press, Jonathan <Jonathan.Press@...>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Eric Paris <eparis@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <malware-list@...>, <linux-security-module@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:51 pm

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:38:23 -0400
"Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@ca.com> wrote:


How can you, as a security professional, argue for a security measure
that you know is flawed, when there is a mailing list full of people
willing to help figure out what a working security measure would look
like?

Yes, abandoning some of the old DOS anti-virus security model may
cause work, but surely that will be worth it if it leads to a more
secure system?

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Sidebar to [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 7:40 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfa..., David Collier-Brown, (Mon Aug 11, 12:11 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfa..., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Aug 13, 10:28 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinterfa..., Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 5, 8:51 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interf..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 7:31 am)