Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: add misrouted interrupt error handling

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-pci@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 4:53 pm

On Tuesday, August 05, 2008 1:44 pm James Bottomley wrote:

If it's just a pci_irq_type function then it probably shouldn't print 
anything, and leave that to the caller, since it might be used for other 
purposes too (e.g. a driver load printk or something).  In the lost interrupt 
case you already have to disable MSI or MSIX in the Fusion driver, so you may 
as well put the printk there, right?  I guess I'm saying it should neither 
note nor advise, just return the IRQ type.


Yeah, ACPI may or may not be the problem, all you'll really know is that 
you've got a line interrupt that you failed to get...  The driver won't be 
able to do much in that case aside from complain loudly.

Thanks,
Jesse
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/2] pci: add misrouted interrupt error handling, James Bottomley, (Sun Aug 3, 2:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: add misrouted interrupt error handling, Jesse Barnes, (Tue Aug 5, 4:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: add misrouted interrupt error handling, James Bottomley, (Sun Aug 3, 11:46 pm)