[PATCH 10/14] uml: stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Dike
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 1:14 pm

From 3d5ede6f776bdb1483bcd086f79c3bf41fed3865

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
index 1e8cba6..2328098 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
  * Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
  * SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
  */
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
 
 /* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
 #define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 10/14] uml: stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH, Jeff Dike, (Tue Aug 5, 1:14 pm)