On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:26:07PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:

quoted text
>> > >The userspace headers are independent of any kernel configuration
>> > >(except for the architecture).
>> > 
>> > I beg to disagree:
>> > internals as exposed by e.g. aio_abi.h are impl dependent. Noone except
>> > the impl and it's users are interrested in it.
>> >...
>> 
>> That's utter bullshit.
>> 
>> The contents of aio_abi.h is a kernel<->userspace ABI that mustn't ever 
>> change. [1]
>
>Case in point:
>
>I want to be able to compile an application for embedded Linux which
>*can use* Linux-AIO, but can also run on a kernel which has Linux-AIO
>removed by this patch.
>
>I still want to compile the application with that capability, in case
>it's run on another kernel with it enabled.
>
>I shouldn't have to have a separate, special kernel with all options
>enabled, just to compile applications that run on multiple kernels and
>use run-time features when available.
>
>Just like all the other kernel<->userspace interfaces, the header
>files (including their presence) shouldn't depend on kernel
>configuration at all.

alright, makes perfect sense. I must have been playing too much with
libc recently, i guess.

thanks,
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/