Re: linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: John W. Linville <linville@...>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <linux-next@...>, David Miller <davem@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 12:35 pm

Hi John,

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:00:26 -0400 "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.co=
m> wrote:
w?

I think that "not yet" is the answer :-(

If we don't get a useful answer soon, we may just have to merge the
driver with appropriately commented negative "depends on" in Kconfig for
the arches it breaks.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Aug 5, 2:21 am)
Re: linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 5, 11:37 am)
Re: linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure, John W. Linville, (Tue Aug 5, 12:00 pm)
[2.6 patch] ath9k: work around gcc ICEs, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 5, 3:06 pm)
Re: linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Aug 5, 12:35 pm)
Re: linux-next: wireless-current tree build failure, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Aug 5, 12:02 pm)