On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:02, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:
quoted text
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:

quoted text
> > --
> > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> > geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> No I was not, but I am now.  At any rate, I removed the Microsoft-isms
> from the code.  I can cut yet another patch for git6, but git5 was there
> -- GPL2 and all.  How about putting in into the kernel guys -- :-)

Seriously? Because it doesn't seem to have had enough peer review,
it hasn't had widespread testing in somewhere like linux-next or
-mm, and we already have kgdb so you have to also explain why you
can't improve kgdb in the areas it trails mdb.

But the ideal outcome would be if you could contribute patches to
kgdb to the point where it is as good as mdb. It is already in the
tree and supported by a handful of architectures... any chance of
that? (I don't know kernel debugger code, so I ask as an interested
user)
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/