> I didn't want to change multiple architectures with a single patch so I
I wouldn't say there's a strict rule. It's a balance to find between
the complexity of the patch, the risk of breaking archs, etc...
In your case, the added churn of going through a temporary renamed
helper represents more, imho, than the risk of breakage of what is
a fairly trivial patch in the first place. Also, it only affects a few
archs. So it's simpler or everybody to deal with a single patch even if
that means it -might- need a rev or two in case it does indeed break
something...
Ben.
--