Re: [Patch 0/2] Renaming 'trace' to 'relay' and enhancements to 'relay'

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, August 4, 2008 - 3:25 pm

On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:34:39 +0530
"K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:


I'm a bit perplexed by these trace patches
(http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/trace-code-and-documentation.patch).
 Is it useful?  Will it be useful?  Has anyone expressed
interest/intent to use it, etc?  I haven't heard much noise about it
and I'm struggling to justify merging it.

Also, it's starting to look somewhat similar to ftrace, which also
provides sort of high-bandwidth per-cpu channels into userspace for
tracing purposes.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Patch 0/2] Renaming 'trace' to 'relay' and enhancemen ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 4, 3:25 pm)