Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <matthew@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Monday, August 4, 2008 - 5:43 pm

Well looks okay. Sigh. I sure wish we would deal with the page allocator
performance instead of adding more buffering.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon Aug 4, 5:39 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Aug 12, 8:27 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL, Pekka Enberg, (Tue Aug 12, 8:33 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLUB: dynamic per-cache MIN_PARTIAL, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Aug 4, 5:43 pm)