Re: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, August 4, 2008 - 3:31 pm

Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

Looks good to me. You did not change the old interface which still does
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() (ie racy against sched_setaffinity()) but it's not in
hotplug path and we can take care of that later.

Test here too (dell latitude d620 - core2 duo). I have correct ucode files and
stuff. My cpu does not seem to need any updates so the actual update does not
get applied but everything else (workqueue, request firmware, etc) is working
as expected.

Works very here.

btw I do not think it's to bulky for -rc. Seems like a very straightforward fixes.

Max


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode, Dmitry Adamushko, (Sun Aug 3, 11:42 am)
Re: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode, Max Krasnyansky, (Mon Aug 4, 3:31 pm)
Re: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode, Dmitry Adamushko, (Mon Aug 4, 4:01 pm)
Re: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode, Max Krasnyansky, (Mon Aug 4, 5:32 pm)