Re: regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ak@...>, <mtk.manpages@...>, <shields@...>, <hirofumi@...>
Date: Monday, August 4, 2008 - 7:18 am

Dear Michael,



 Yes, I do agree with you. After Linux Kernel version 2.4.19 , the
ENOMEM error resulted instead of EFAULT in the mprotect().

Regards,

Maxin B. John
Bangalore, India
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel, Maxin John, (Thu Jul 31, 6:24 am)
Re: regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 31, 11:09 am)
Re: regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Aug 4, 6:34 am)
Re: regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Aug 4, 6:41 am)
Re: regarding mprotect() implementation in 2.6.26 kernel, Maxin John, (Mon Aug 4, 7:18 am)