> please use split_e820_reserve_xx2.patch instead...

OK, that produces the same result:  a happy kernel!

I compared the full 'dmesg' output from the previous build and the
current build using diff:  the only differences were trivial --
return times from initcall functions, and the order in which some
initcalls were performed was different very late in the boot process.


Thanks Yinghai,
Dave W.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/