On Sunday 03 August 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted text > On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:37:56 +0200
> Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, here's a definitely better solution:
>
> Please don't stuff large important pieces of code in header files where
> they will be overlooked
>
> NAK this.
>
> I'm happy to have a shared library directory for ATA stuff, containing
> useful C code, but hiding stuff in headers like that is just plain wrong.
The code in question is 65 LOC total (43 LOC without counting comments)
so having a shared library just for it sounds like an overkill and we may
just copy that one function from pata_legacy to ide_generic instead.
Jeff, what is your stance here?
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] pata_legacy: export functionality to ide , Bartlomiej Zolnierki ... , (Sun Aug 3, 6:37 am)