Re: [PATCH 3/5] libata: Implement disk shock protection support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008 - 6:05 am

> Was that something intentional or was it a happy accident?  There can be

IDLE IMMEDIATE is part of the "historic" specification rather than modern
ATA standards. Older drives support it happily newer ones tended to get
quite cross.


We'd have to query the drive vendors to see what they expected.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] Disk shock protection in GNU/Linux, Elias Oltmanns, (Fri Jul 25, 11:20 pm)
[PATCH 2/5] Introduce ata_id_has_unload(), Elias Oltmanns, (Fri Jul 25, 11:24 pm)
[PATCH 3/5] libata: Implement disk shock protection support, Elias Oltmanns, (Fri Jul 25, 11:25 pm)
[PATCH 4/5] ide: Implement disk shock protection support, Elias Oltmanns, (Fri Jul 25, 11:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] Introduce ata_id_has_unload(), Alan Cox, (Sat Jul 26, 9:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/5] libata: Implement disk shock protection su ..., Alan Cox, (Sun Aug 3, 6:05 am)