"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> writes:

quoted text
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>
>> It appears that quite a few of the places you have changed are testing
>> to see if an irq is valid.  The idiomatic way to perform that test in
>> the kernel is:
>>
>> if (irq)
>
> is uninitialized irq to be -1 or 0?

0.  There is a long history behind it, but by decree of Linus and to conform
with reasonable intuition 0 is not a valid irq except in certain arch specific
corner cases.

quoted text
>> With no test to see if you are >= NR_IRQS.
>>
>> I expect that is the change we want in the drivers that are performing such a
> silly
>> extra check.
>
> is_irq_valid(irq_no) ?
>
> wait to see your new patchset about dyn irq_cfg and irq_desc

I haven't promised one, at least not lately.  I went down a couple of
blind alleys and figured out what needed to be accomplished and then
ran out of steam about a year and a half 2 years ago, and I haven't
been able to get back to it.

Eric
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/