On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:36:28 +0200
Why? I don't recall ever having been interested in this information.
(I shouldn't have to ask questions like this. Please spend a little
more time in preparing the patch descriptions).
I wrote and used the patch once, as I wanted to know
which program in a lengthy multiple-program test suite
was triggering the problem. That made it easier coming
up with a shortened test that would replicate the problem.
However I only needed it that one time so this patch can
be considered to be exceptionally optional :)
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:45:20 -0400
WARN() and WARN_ON() already print the oopsing process.
so if might_sleep() just calls one of those it already prints it.
If it doesn't call one of these.. maybe it should?
If you want to reach me at my work email, use firstname.lastname@example.org
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,