On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:48:07 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> We could fix this by moving the assertion inside the lock, but it seems
> safer and saner to revert to the old behaviour wherein
> entropy_store.entropy_count at no time exceeds
> entropy_store.poolinfo->POOLBITS.

The fixed version even generates improved code.

Let's try to avoid repeats:

--- a/drivers/char/random.c~drivers-char-randomc-fix-a-race-which-can-lead-to-a-bogus-bug-fix
+++ a/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ struct entropy_store {
 	/* read-write data: */
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	unsigned add_ptr;
-	int entropy_count;
+	int entropy_count;	/* Must at no time exceed ->POOLBITS! */
 	int input_rotate;
 };
 
_

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/