Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pascal Terjan
Date: Friday, August 29, 2008 - 10:51 am

Le mercredi 27 août 2008 à 22:44 +0200, Pascal Terjan a écrit :

OK I was very unlucky...
For some reason when 2.6.26.2 was OK but 2.6.26.3 built inside the rpm
will always fail (or maybe very often, harder to test).
And when rebuilding the module by hand, it will work most of the time,
but I got the bug after unloading/reloading it about 30 times in a row,
so it's just that this chip is affected by the random bug and something
make it more likely to happen.


I applied these patches meaning that now the write will not occur, and
tried to unload/load the module 200 times but after some time I got a
oops in rtl_tx_performance_tweak (and could not capture it).

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 2:20 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Marcus Sundberg, (Wed Aug 27, 3:38 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 3:40 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Francois Romieu, (Wed Aug 27, 1:11 pm)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 1:44 pm)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Fri Aug 29, 10:51 am)