Re: [PATCH 5/5] CUSE: implement CUSE - Character device in Userspace

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Bowler
Date: Friday, August 29, 2008 - 8:27 am

On 04:09 Fri 29 Aug     , Tejun Heo wrote:

Boolean bit-fields are indeed valid.  Usual semantics for objects of type
_Bool apply.

C99 6.7.2.1 Structure and union specifiers

4   A bit-field shall have a type that is a qualified or unqualified
    version of _Bool, signed int, unsigned int, or some other
    implementation-defined type.

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Semiconductor (http://www.ellipticsemi.com/)

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Tejun Heo, (Thu Aug 28, 11:18 am)
[PATCH 2/5] FUSE: export symbols to be used by CUSE, Tejun Heo, (Thu Aug 28, 11:19 am)
[PATCH 4/5] FUSE: add fuse_conn->release(), Tejun Heo, (Thu Aug 28, 11:19 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Mike Hommey, (Thu Aug 28, 10:50 pm)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Tejun Heo, (Thu Aug 28, 10:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] CUSE: implement CUSE - Character device in ..., Nick Bowler, (Fri Aug 29, 8:27 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Archie Cobbs, (Fri Aug 29, 11:50 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Tejun Heo, (Sat Aug 30, 5:30 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Goswin von Brederlow, (Sat Aug 30, 9:35 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Mike Hommey, (Sat Aug 30, 11:56 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Archie Cobbs, (Sat Aug 30, 3:39 pm)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE , hooanon05, (Sat Aug 30, 9:52 pm)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Goswin von Brederlow, (Mon Sep 1, 12:20 am)
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE, Mike Hommey, (Mon Sep 1, 12:38 am)