Re: [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Friday, August 29, 2008 - 8:36 am

On Friday 29 August 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

What is the tradeoff here? Where is the advantage in using the
traditional timer interface for longer timeouts?

	Arnd <><
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/5] select: add a timespec version of the timeout ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Aug 29, 8:06 am)
[PATCH 3/5] select: introduce a schedule_hrtimeout() function, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Aug 29, 8:07 am)
[PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout(), Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Aug 29, 8:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout(), Arnd Bergmann, (Fri Aug 29, 8:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout(), Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Aug 29, 10:42 am)