Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> This is *hard* to get right, and we screw this up in the kernel with
>> painful regularity. The throught of having user-space processes, which
>> don't have access to the kernel locking primitives and functions like
>> copy_from_user() dealing with this stuff scares me crazy.
>
> What issues exactly are you thinking of?
Memory changing underneath you. It can be dealt with by very careful
sequencing only.
quoted text >> That is why I'm suggesting using an in-kernel linearizer.
>
> Lots of complexity, ugh... Even Tejun's current scheme is better IMO.
And then you get *no* privilege separation, for one thing, so why even
bother doing it in userspace?
-hpa
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 5/7] FUSE: implement ioctl support , H. Peter Anvin , (Thu Aug 28, 5:27 pm)