> And I'm not really interested. Quite frankly, I suspect the "we want to

quoted text
> run something like pulseaudio with RT priorities" camp is the more common

> one, and in that context I understand limiting SCHED_FIFO sounds perfectly

> understandable.

Is there actually a reason we can't have two forms of SCHED_FIFO. For

hard RT the existing behaviour is a lot more useful and it is hard to see

how you'd emulate it.
> quite frankly, most programmers aren't "supposedly bad". And if you think

quoted text
> that the hard-RT "real man" programmers aren't bad, I really have nothing

> to say.

"real man" programmers stare at the code in Zen contemplation and debug

by powercycling - thats one thing even hard RT processes can't beat.
Alan

--

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/