Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...>, David Miller <davem@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008 - 4:54 pm

Adrian Bunk wrote:

Yeah, I suppose. The problem doing that unconditionally is that it 
increases kernel text slightly on some architectures (e.g. sparc). 
However, as long as you use the KMEMCHECK_BIT_FIELD annotation only in 
places that give you false positives, it's we should be safe.

		Pekka
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 2:32 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Aug 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 2:46 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Aug 28, 3:05 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 3:18 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 3:07 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka J Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 3:02 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 3:38 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Sat Aug 30, 4:28 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Aug 28, 4:27 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 4:59 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 4:54 pm)