Hi Alexey,
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
quoted text >> Would it help (to make this less
>> horrible) to omit the type declaration and have just the bitfield
>> members as arguments to the macro?
>
> Or you can parse instruction stream a bit more.
Uhm, I'm not sure how that would work out. I mean, we'd need to see if
parts of the loaded byte are used or not... Doesn't sound practical or
too pretty.
Pekka
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API , Pekka Enberg , (Thu Aug 28, 3:07 pm)