Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alexey Dobriyan
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008 - 12:05 pm

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:46:43PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:

Of course, no.


It should be signed int or unsigned int for maximum portability.


Or you can parse instruction stream a bit more.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 11:32 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Aug 28, 11:40 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 11:40 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 11:46 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka J Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 12:02 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Aug 28, 12:05 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 12:07 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 12:18 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 12:38 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Aug 28, 1:27 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Aug 28, 1:54 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Aug 28, 1:59 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API, Vegard Nossum, (Sat Aug 30, 1:28 am)