On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:18:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted text
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:27:35 +0200
> 
> > > Those banks really want to crank down on latency - to the point they 
> > > start disabling interrupt coalescing.  I bet they'd toss anything out 
> > > they could to shave another microsecond.
> > 
> > This change would actually likely lower their latency.
> 
> They want the timestamps, but they want it to match when the packet
> arrived at their system as closely as is reasonably possible.

Then they should use hardware time stamps which are increasingly 
available (e.g. current Intel e1000 design has them and I expect
others too). 

-Andi

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/