Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Simon Farnsworth
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 10:13 am

Joe Korty wrote:
JOOI, what's wrong with having your init scripts contain a line like:
echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/time
?

This has the advantage that you can avoid turning the kernel's
timestamps off until you know that syslog is running and timestamp
events that it's receiving.
-- 
Simon Farnsworth

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Joe Korty, (Wed Aug 27, 8:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Simon Farnsworth, (Wed Aug 27, 8:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Mark Brown, (Wed Aug 27, 9:16 am)
[PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Joe Korty, (Wed Aug 27, 10:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Simon Farnsworth, (Wed Aug 27, 10:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 27, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Aug 28, 2:40 am)