Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 9:16 am

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:16:13AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:


It'd be nicer if this were optional - syslog typically only logs at
second resolution and not all systems are going to have logfiles.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Joe Korty, (Wed Aug 27, 8:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Simon Farnsworth, (Wed Aug 27, 8:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, Mark Brown, (Wed Aug 27, 9:16 am)
[PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Joe Korty, (Wed Aug 27, 10:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Simon Farnsworth, (Wed Aug 27, 10:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 27, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Aug 28, 2:40 am)