Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for August 26 - Badness at kernel/notifier.c:25

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 7:38 am

Hi Arjan,

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:33:08 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> =
wrote:

But, of course, that version didn't have the necessary extra dereference
of the function address ...

And the later debug patch did not check the address at register time,
only at notify time.

The later trace also looks to be early in the boot.
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for August 26, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Aug 26, 1:40 am)
[BUG] linux-next: Tree for August 26 - Badness at kernel/n ..., Kamalesh Babulal, (Tue Aug 26, 11:27 am)
[PATCH -next] net: fix compilation NG when !CONFIG_MODULE, Hiroshi Shimamoto, (Tue Aug 26, 4:49 pm)
[PATCH -next] initramfs: fix compilation warning, Hiroshi Shimamoto, (Tue Aug 26, 4:56 pm)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for August 26 - Badness at kern ..., Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Aug 27, 7:38 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for August 26 - Badness at kern ..., Kamalesh Babulal, (Wed Aug 27, 10:52 am)