On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:39:15 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

quoted text
> 
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > The patch below fixes this;
> > Ingo, please replace the patch with this one.
> 
> well, this one is now less than cheap on x86:

really it isn't; dereference_function_descriptor is a fall through and
basically free.

quoted text
> 
> as it's rather large. So i kept the config option, and it defaults to 
> off.

huh? the consensus was that the config needed to go ... nothing changed
on that front. I agree absolutely with not introducing config options
for things that don't need it; we have too many already anyway.


quoted text
> 
> > +		if (!func_ptr_is_kernel_text(nb->notifier_call)) {
> > +			WARN(1, "Invalid notifier called!");
> > +			nb = next_nb;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> 
> and that should be an unlikely() too i guess.

please do not add new unlikely()'s to the kernel.. not on non-hotpaths
at least

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/