Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pascal Terjan
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 - 3:40 am

Le mercredi 27 août 2008 à 12:38 +0200, Marcus Sundberg a écrit :

eth0: RTL8169 at 0xe04ee000, 00:1e:68:a0:07:b5, XID 24a00000 IRQ 17


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 2:20 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Marcus Sundberg, (Wed Aug 27, 3:38 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 3:40 am)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Francois Romieu, (Wed Aug 27, 1:11 pm)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Wed Aug 27, 1:44 pm)
Re: r8169 regression in 2.6.26.3 vs 2.6.26.2, Pascal Terjan, (Fri Aug 29, 10:51 am)