KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted text >>> + int node = numa_node_id();
>>> + struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
>>> + int num_cpus_on_node;
>>> + node_to_cpumask_ptr(cpumask_on_node, node);
>>>
>>> node_free_pages =
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
>>> @@ -38,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
>>> zone_page_state(&zones[ZONE_NORMAL], NR_FREE_PAGES);
>>>
>>> max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
>>> +
>>> + num_cpus_on_node = cpus_weight_nr(*cpumask_on_node);
>>> + max /= num_cpus_on_node;
>>> +
>>> return max(max, min_pages);
>> Exactly! And (many thanks to them!) the sparc maintainers have
>> implemented a similar internal function definition for node_to_cpumask_ptr().
>
> Can I think get your Ack?
>
Based on code review, sure. I'll also give it a try on one of my
test machines as soon as I can.
Mike
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to ... , Mike Travis , (Tue Aug 26, 4:35 pm)