Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Russell King
Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 6:19 am

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 02:43:12PM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:

Thankfully, the recent uboot versions now allow the ID passed to be
configurable via its scripts, rather than being compiled in, so this
means compile time mistakes can be easily corrected without reflashing
the boot loader.  I'm not involved with uboot at all, so I couldn't
tell you which versions are what.

But everything Marc says in his reply is correct.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Tue Aug 26, 3:30 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Marc Pignat, (Tue Aug 26, 5:43 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Ben Dooks, (Tue Aug 26, 6:17 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Russell King, (Tue Aug 26, 6:19 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Wed Aug 27, 3:09 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Wed Aug 27, 3:09 am)