Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Marc Pignat
Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 5:43 am

Hi!

On Tuesday 26 August 2008, you wrote:
If it is really equivalent, you can use the same MACH_TYPE, else you should
register another.


The "default machine" selection is a *hack* for machines with a bootloader too
old, buggy or closed source.

The right fix is to change the MACH_TYPE that you've compiled in u-boot.


This is a cleanup patch, if the hack is not removed, bootloaders will *never*
be fixed...

Best regards


Marc

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Tue Aug 26, 3:30 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Marc Pignat, (Tue Aug 26, 5:43 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Ben Dooks, (Tue Aug 26, 6:17 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Russell King, (Tue Aug 26, 6:19 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Wed Aug 27, 3:09 am)
Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type, Claudio Scordino, (Wed Aug 27, 3:09 am)