Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 - 12:01 am

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

Looks like the kernel was W-tainted already... so likely there was a
BUG or a WARNING even before this. And I think this sort of warning
can happen if a(nother) process was killed while preemption was off
(e.g. a BUG() at the wrong moment). Ryan?


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper, Ryan Hope, (Mon Aug 25, 7:09 pm)
Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper, Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 25, 11:37 pm)
Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper, Vegard Nossum, (Tue Aug 26, 12:01 am)
Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper, Dmitry Adamushko, (Tue Aug 26, 1:11 am)
Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper, Andrew Morton, (Tue Aug 26, 1:24 am)