> > + int node = numa_node_id();
quoted text > > + struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
> > + int num_cpus_on_node;
> > + node_to_cpumask_ptr(cpumask_on_node, node);
> >
> > node_free_pages =
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> > @@ -38,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
> > zone_page_state(&zones[ZONE_NORMAL], NR_FREE_PAGES);
> >
> > max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
> > +
> > + num_cpus_on_node = cpus_weight_nr(*cpumask_on_node);
> > + max /= num_cpus_on_node;
> > +
> > return max(max, min_pages);
>
> Exactly! And (many thanks to them!) the sparc maintainers have
> implemented a similar internal function definition for node_to_cpumask_ptr().
Can I think get your Ack?
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to ... , KOSAKI Motohiro , (Mon Aug 25, 7:33 pm)