Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jamie Lokier
Date: Monday, August 25, 2008 - 5:01 am

Dave Chinner wrote:


There's nothing wrong with adding BIO_META (for example) and other
hints in _principle_.  You should be able to ignore it with no adverse
effects.  If its not used by a filesystem (and there's nothing else
competing to use the same disk), I would hope to see the same
performance as other kernels which don't have it.

If the elevators are being changed in such a way that old filesystem
code which doesn't use new hint bits is running significantly slower,
surely that's blatant elevator regression, and that's where the bugs
should be reported and fixed?

-- Jamie
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Tue Aug 19, 7:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Wed Aug 20, 9:13 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Wed Aug 20, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Wed Aug 20, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Wed Aug 20, 2:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Wed Aug 20, 7:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Wed Aug 20, 9:57 pm)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Martin Steigerwald, (Thu Aug 21, 4:02 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Martin Steigerwald, (Thu Aug 21, 8:00 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Thu Aug 21, 10:10 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Thu Aug 21, 10:33 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Martin Steigerwald, (Thu Aug 21, 11:49 pm)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Fri Aug 22, 5:44 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Sat Aug 23, 5:52 am)
Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuo ..., Jamie Lokier, (Mon Aug 25, 5:01 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Tue Aug 26, 9:54 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Thu Aug 28, 11:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, konishi.ryusuke, (Fri Aug 29, 3:51 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system, Ryusuke Konishi, (Fri Aug 29, 9:37 am)