Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-blocking waiting

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008 - 5:53 pm

On Thursday 21 August 2008 05:25:46 Andrew Morton wrote:

The reason I'm interested is that we have 331 cpu_relax() calls outside the 
arch trees.  That seems like a lot, and I wonder if what they really want is
a spinpletion.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-blocki ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Aug 16, 9:34 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-bl ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Aug 16, 10:47 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-bl ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Aug 20, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-bl ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Aug 20, 1:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-bl ..., Rusty Russell, (Sun Aug 24, 5:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a trigger API for efficient non-bl ..., Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Aug 28, 5:27 am)