> Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this.
quoted text
> 
> None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO 
> F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that 
> has historically easily introduced new regressions.
> 
> Can you please make a branch with ONLY REGRESSIONS, or fixes for major 
> problems that don't introduce several thousand lines of new code?
> 
> Because you seem to be constantly unable to understand what "merge window" 
> means. And I'm not going to take this kind of crap.

I thought you might say that, I'll re-send with just the ones that fix the 
major issues, instead of ones that fix issues people wanted fixed. Most of 
the real bits were in Rawhide kernels for a few weeks, which tbh kicks the 
ass outta a linux-next/linux-mm test cycle.

Your reply now serves as place to point people at when they ask why Red 
Hat/Fedora ships features that they can't get for 1-6 months, and I'm fine 
with that.

Dave.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/