login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
August
»
23
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Rufus & Azrael
Subject:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2008 - 12:40 pm
Yinghai Lu wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Rufus& Azrael > <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:58 AM, David Witbrodt<dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> please send out after booting with hpet=disable >>>>> lspci -tv >>>>> lspci -vvxxx >>>>> >>>> Info attached: >>>> >>> 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 13) >>> Subsystem: Elitegroup Computer Systems Device 2621 >>> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- >>> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ >>> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium>TAbort- >>> <TAbort-<MAbort->SERR-<PERR- INTx- >>> Region 0: I/O ports at fa00 [size=16] >>> Region 1: Memory at 80000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] >>> Capabilities: [b0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable- Fixed+ >>> Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus >>> 00: 02 10 85 43 03 04 30 02 13 00 05 0c 00 00 80 00 >>> 10: 01 fa 00 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 19 10 21 26 >>> 30: 00 00 00 00 b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> 40: d4 3b 00 05 00 00 00 00 0f ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> 50: f0 01 f0 0e f0 0f f0 07 11 0b f0 0f 00 00 00 00 >>> 60: 01 00 24 00 bf fd de 8f 3f 90 00 00 20 00 00 00 >>> 70: 00 01 00 00 08 00 c0 fe ff 6e 00 00 00 00 f0 0f >>> 80: f0 0a f0 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8c 00 00 80 >>> 90: 01 fa 00 00 fa de ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> a0: 00 00 ff ff ff ff f0 08 ff fd 12 02 16 7b 20 00 >>> b0: 08 00 02 a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 0f 08 1a >>> c0: ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> d0: 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> e0: 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>> f0: d8 0c 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 aa 00 10 01 >>> it seems kernel update BAR1 from 0xfed00000 to 0x80000000 after it can >>> not give 0xfed00000 to that device. >>> please try attached patch, and send out lspci -vvxxxx again. >>> YH >>> [PATCH] x86: protect hpet in BAR for one ATI chipset >>> >>> so avoid kernel don't allocate nre resource for it because it can not >>> allocate the old >>> address from BIOS. >>> >>> the same way like some IO APIC address in BAR handling >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yhlu.kenrel@gmail.com> >>> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c >>> =================================================================== >>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c >>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c >>> @@ -1918,6 +1918,22 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_B >>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5709S, >>> quirk_brcm_570x_limit_vpd); >>> >>> +static void __init quirk_hpet_in_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>> +{ >>> + int i; >>> + unsigned int base, size; >>> + >>> + /* the BAR1 is the location of the HPET...we must >>> + * not touch this, so forcibly insert it into the resource tree */ >>> + base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 1); >>> + size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 1); >>> + if (base&& size) { >>> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource,&pdev->resource[1]); >>> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "HPET at %04x-%04x\n", name, base, >>> base + size - 1); >>> + } >>> +} >>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x3485, quirk_hpet_in_bar); >>> + >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >>> /* Some chipsets do not support MSI. We cannot easily rely on setting >>> * PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI in its bus flags because there are actually >>> >> Hi Yinghai, >> >> >> Your patch seems to be broken, see : >> >> >>> CC drivers/pci/quirks.o >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c: In function 'quirk_hpet_in_bar': >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: 'dev' undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: (Each undeclared identifier is reported >>> only once >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: for each function it appears in.) >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: 'name' undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: attention : trop d'arguments pour le format >>> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1795: attention : unused variable 'i' >>> make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/quirks.o] Erreur 1 >>> > > please check v2. > > YH >
Thanks Yinghai, Your patch applied, I attach lspci -vvxxxx. Regards.
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 11:26 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:17 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:40 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:10 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:15 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:28 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:33 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:35 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:36 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:45 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 2:05 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Thu Aug 28, 3:52 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Andreas Herrmann
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:39 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:45 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Sep 14, 9:25 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mel Gorman
Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in_node
Guenter Roeck
Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers
David Woodhouse
Re: RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the kernel.
Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU k...
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MIPS] Fix potential latency problem due to non-atomic cpu_wait.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
USB: rename USB_SPEED_VARIABLE to USB_SPEED_WIRELESS
Linux Kernel Mailing List
lib/vsprintf.c: fix bug omitting minus sign of numbers (module_param)
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[Bluetooth] Initiate authentication during connection establishment
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] 4xx: Add ppc40x_defconfig
linux-netdev
:
MERCEDES
Your mail id has won 950,000.00 in the MERCEDES Benz Online Promo.for claims send:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: do not mark packets of length < MSS as GSO
David Miller
Re: skb_segment() questions
Shan Wei
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/5]IPv6:netfilter: Send an ICMPv6 "Fragment Reassembly Timeou...
Stanislaw Gruszka
[PATCH 1/4] bnx2x: use smp_mb() to keep ordering of read write operations
git
:
Nicolas Sebrecht
git-svn died of signal 11 (was "3 failures on test t9100 (svn)")
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
Martin Langhoff
Re: [PATCH] GIT commit statistics.
Alexandre Julliard
[PATCH] gitweb: Put back shortlog instead of graphiclog in the project list.
Josh Triplett
[PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
openbsd-misc
:
Taisto Qvist XX
Re: AMD GEODE LX-800 just works with kernel from install42.iso and kernelpanics wi...
Nico Meijer
Re: gOS Develop Kit with VIA pc-1 Processor Platform VIA C7-D
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: jetway board sensors (Fintek F71805F)
admin
Drive a 2009 car from R799p/m
Antti Harri
Re: how to create a sha256 hash
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate