login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
August
»
23
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2008 - 12:17 pm
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> wrote:
quoted text
>> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:58 AM, David Witbrodt<dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> please send out after booting with hpet=disable >> >> lspci -tv >> >> lspci -vvxxx >> > >> > Info attached: >> >> 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 13) >> Subsystem: Elitegroup Computer Systems Device 2621 >> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- >> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ >> Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium>TAbort- >> <TAbort-<MAbort->SERR-<PERR- INTx- >> Region 0: I/O ports at fa00 [size=16] >> Region 1: Memory at 80000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] >> Capabilities: [b0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable- Fixed+ >> Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus >> 00: 02 10 85 43 03 04 30 02 13 00 05 0c 00 00 80 00 >> 10: 01 fa 00 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 19 10 21 26 >> 30: 00 00 00 00 b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 40: d4 3b 00 05 00 00 00 00 0f ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 50: f0 01 f0 0e f0 0f f0 07 11 0b f0 0f 00 00 00 00 >> 60: 01 00 24 00 bf fd de 8f 3f 90 00 00 20 00 00 00 >> 70: 00 01 00 00 08 00 c0 fe ff 6e 00 00 00 00 f0 0f >> 80: f0 0a f0 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8c 00 00 80 >> 90: 01 fa 00 00 fa de ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> a0: 00 00 ff ff ff ff f0 08 ff fd 12 02 16 7b 20 00 >> b0: 08 00 02 a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 0f 08 1a >> c0: ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> d0: 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> e0: 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> f0: d8 0c 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 aa 00 10 01 >> it seems kernel update BAR1 from 0xfed00000 to 0x80000000 after it can >> not give 0xfed00000 to that device. >> please try attached patch, and send out lspci -vvxxxx again. >> YH >> [PATCH] x86: protect hpet in BAR for one ATI chipset >> >> so avoid kernel don't allocate nre resource for it because it can not >> allocate the old >> address from BIOS. >> >> the same way like some IO APIC address in BAR handling >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yhlu.kenrel@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c >> @@ -1918,6 +1918,22 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_B >> PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5709S, >> quirk_brcm_570x_limit_vpd); >> >> +static void __init quirk_hpet_in_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + unsigned int base, size; >> + >> + /* the BAR1 is the location of the HPET...we must >> + * not touch this, so forcibly insert it into the resource tree */ >> + base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 1); >> + size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 1); >> + if (base&& size) { >> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource,&pdev->resource[1]); >> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "HPET at %04x-%04x\n", name, base, >> base + size - 1); >> + } >> +} >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x3485, quirk_hpet_in_bar); >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> /* Some chipsets do not support MSI. We cannot easily rely on setting >> * PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI in its bus flags because there are actually > > Hi Yinghai, > > > Your patch seems to be broken, see : > >> CC drivers/pci/quirks.o >> drivers/pci/quirks.c: In function 'quirk_hpet_in_bar': >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: 'dev' undeclared (first use in this >> function) >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: (Each undeclared identifier is reported >> only once >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: for each function it appears in.) >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: 'name' undeclared (first use in this >> function) >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: attention : trop d'arguments pour le format >> drivers/pci/quirks.c:1795: attention : unused variable 'i' >> make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/quirks.o] Erreur 1 >
please check v2. YH
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 11:26 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:17 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:40 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:10 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:15 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:28 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:33 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:35 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:36 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:45 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 2:05 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Thu Aug 28, 3:52 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Andreas Herrmann
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:39 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:45 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Sep 14, 9:25 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mel Gorman
Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in_node
Guenter Roeck
Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers
David Woodhouse
Re: RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the kernel.
Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU k...
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MIPS] Fix potential latency problem due to non-atomic cpu_wait.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
USB: rename USB_SPEED_VARIABLE to USB_SPEED_WIRELESS
Linux Kernel Mailing List
lib/vsprintf.c: fix bug omitting minus sign of numbers (module_param)
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[Bluetooth] Initiate authentication during connection establishment
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] 4xx: Add ppc40x_defconfig
linux-netdev
:
MERCEDES
Your mail id has won 950,000.00 in the MERCEDES Benz Online Promo.for claims send:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: do not mark packets of length < MSS as GSO
David Miller
Re: skb_segment() questions
Shan Wei
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/5]IPv6:netfilter: Send an ICMPv6 "Fragment Reassembly Timeou...
Stanislaw Gruszka
[PATCH 1/4] bnx2x: use smp_mb() to keep ordering of read write operations
git
:
Nicolas Sebrecht
git-svn died of signal 11 (was "3 failures on test t9100 (svn)")
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
Martin Langhoff
Re: [PATCH] GIT commit statistics.
Alexandre Julliard
[PATCH] gitweb: Put back shortlog instead of graphiclog in the project list.
Josh Triplett
[PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
openbsd-misc
:
Taisto Qvist XX
Re: AMD GEODE LX-800 just works with kernel from install42.iso and kernelpanics wi...
Nico Meijer
Re: gOS Develop Kit with VIA pc-1 Processor Platform VIA C7-D
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: jetway board sensors (Fintek F71805F)
admin
Drive a 2009 car from R799p/m
Antti Harri
Re: how to create a sha256 hash
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate