login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
August
»
23
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
view
thread
Previous message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Rufus & Azrael
Subject:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2008 - 11:26 am
>
quoted text
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:58 AM, David Witbrodt<dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > >> please send out after booting with hpet=disable > >> lspci -tv > >> lspci -vvxxx > > > > Info attached: > > 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 13) > Subsystem: Elitegroup Computer Systems Device 2621 > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- > Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ > Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium>TAbort- > <TAbort-<MAbort->SERR-<PERR- INTx- > Region 0: I/O ports at fa00 [size=16] > Region 1: Memory at 80000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] > Capabilities: [b0] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping Enable- Fixed+ > Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus > 00: 02 10 85 43 03 04 30 02 13 00 05 0c 00 00 80 00 > 10: 01 fa 00 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 19 10 21 26 > 30: 00 00 00 00 b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 40: d4 3b 00 05 00 00 00 00 0f ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 50: f0 01 f0 0e f0 0f f0 07 11 0b f0 0f 00 00 00 00 > 60: 01 00 24 00 bf fd de 8f 3f 90 00 00 20 00 00 00 > 70: 00 01 00 00 08 00 c0 fe ff 6e 00 00 00 00 f0 0f > 80: f0 0a f0 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8c 00 00 80 > 90: 01 fa 00 00 fa de ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > a0: 00 00 ff ff ff ff f0 08 ff fd 12 02 16 7b 20 00 > b0: 08 00 02 a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 0f 08 1a > c0: ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > d0: 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > e0: 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > f0: d8 0c 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 aa 00 10 01 > it seems kernel update BAR1 from 0xfed00000 to 0x80000000 after it can > not give 0xfed00000 to that device. > please try attached patch, and send out lspci -vvxxxx again. > YH > [PATCH] x86: protect hpet in BAR for one ATI chipset > > so avoid kernel don't allocate nre resource for it because it can not allocate the old > address from BIOS. > > the same way like some IO APIC address in BAR handling > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yhlu.kenrel@gmail.com> > > --- > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c > @@ -1918,6 +1918,22 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_B > PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5709S, > quirk_brcm_570x_limit_vpd); > > +static void __init quirk_hpet_in_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + int i; > + unsigned int base, size; > + > + /* the BAR1 is the location of the HPET...we must > + * not touch this, so forcibly insert it into the resource tree */ > + base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 1); > + size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 1); > + if (base&& size) { > + insert_resource(&iomem_resource,&pdev->resource[1]); > + dev_info(&dev->dev, "HPET at %04x-%04x\n", name, base, base + size - 1); > + } > +} > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x3485, quirk_hpet_in_bar); > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI > /* Some chipsets do not support MSI. We cannot easily rely on setting > * PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI in its bus flags because there are actually
Hi Yinghai, Your patch seems to be broken, see :
quoted text
> CC drivers/pci/quirks.o > drivers/pci/quirks.c: In function ‘quirk_hpet_in_bar’: > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in this > function) > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: for each function it appears in.) > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: erreur: ‘name’ undeclared (first use in > this function) > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1804: attention : trop d'arguments pour le format > drivers/pci/quirks.c:1795: attention : unused variable ‘i’ > make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/quirks.o] Erreur 1
Regards. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 11:26 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:17 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 12:40 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:10 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:15 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:28 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:33 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:35 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Rufus & Azrael
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:36 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 1:45 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sat Aug 23, 2:05 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Thu Aug 28, 3:52 pm)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Andreas Herrmann
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:39 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Jordan Crouse
, (Fri Sep 12, 10:45 am)
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found anoth ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Sep 14, 9:25 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
Og dreams of kernels
Jens Axboe
[PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support
Arnd Bergmann
Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables
Mark Brown
[PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset
Tony Breeds
[LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config
git
:
Brian Downing
Re: Git in a Nutshell guide
John Benes
Re: master has some toys
Matthias Lederhofer
[PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree
Alexander Sulfrian
[RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set
Junio C Hamano
Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml?
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
iSeries: fix section mismatch in iseries_veth
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ixbge: remove TX lock and redo TX accounting.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ixgbe: fix several counter register errata
Linux Kernel Mailing List
b43: fix build with CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST=n
Linux Kernel Mailing List
9p: block-based virtio client
linux-netdev
:
Michael Breuer
Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()
Michael Breuer
Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()
David Daney
[PATCH 5/7] Staging: Octeon Ethernet: Convert to NAPI.
Wolfgang Grandegger
[PATCH net-next v4 1/3] can: mscan: fix improper return if dlc < 8 in start_xmi...
Amit Kumar Salecha
[PATCHv3 NEXT 2/2] NET: Add Qlogic ethernet driver for CNA devices
openbsd-misc
:
Theo de Raadt
Re: Old IPSEC bug
Tomáš Bodžár
Problem with vpnc connection - check group password !
Insan Praja SW
Mandoc Compiling Error
Carl Roberso
Re: Cannot change MTU of carp interface?
Richard Daemon
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate