Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Friday, August 22, 2008 - 2:11 pm

Andrew Morton wrote:

1/3 is not a bugfix in itself, but a pre-requisite for 2/3.

2/3 replaces an ad-hoc Xen fix with a general fix to prevent address
truncation when using PFN_PHYS() on any PFN above the 4G mark.  The Xen
crash is the only bug I know of that's directly attributable to this,
and it was already addressed in older kernels with the casts in the Xen
code that this patch removes.

So I don't think there's any strong need to push this to earlier kernels.

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0 of 3] define and use phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Aug 19, 1:02 pm)
[PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Aug 19, 1:02 pm)
[PATCH 2 of 3] make PFN_PHYS explicitly return phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Aug 19, 1:02 pm)
[PATCH 3 of 3] redefine resource_size_t as phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Aug 19, 1:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical ad ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Aug 22, 2:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical ad ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Aug 22, 3:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical ad ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Aug 24, 2:39 am)
Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical ad ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Aug 24, 9:59 am)