Jared Hulbert wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> > Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> One thing for sure is that many people who do non-MMU setups
> >> are interested in XIP to get the space savings. These are very
> >> often small devices with very constrained RAM and flash. (For
> >> whatever it is worth single NOR flash only boards are common in
> >> these smaller form factors :-)
> >
> > I'm using XIP on a device with 32MB RAM.  The reason I use it is
> > _partly_ to save RAM, partly because programs start about 10 times
> > faster (reading NOR flash is slow and I keep the XIP region in RAM)
> 
> What kind of NOR you using?  That is not what I measure with fast
> synchronous burst NOR's.

I think the "fast" in "fast synchronous" gives it away :-)

I'm using Spansion MirrorBit S29GL128N, which reads at about 0.6 MByte/s.

Not because they're good, but because that's what the board I'm coding
for has on it.  I presume they were cheap and familiar to the board
designers.  (There is 32MB of RAM to play with after all.)

So start a sequence of Busybox processes from a shell script is noticable,
if it reads from NOR each time.

Oh, and it's a 166MHz ARM, so it's quite capable of decompressing
faster than the NOR can deliver.

-- Jamie
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/