On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:14:37PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> >> RCU is problematic because it lets cachelines get cold. A hot cacheline that
> >> is used frequently read and written to by the same cpu is very good thing for
> >> performace.
> > 
> > So on your these large boxes, read-only cachelines are preferentially
> > ejected from the cache, so that one should write to per-CPU data
> > occasionally to keep it resident?  Or is the issue the long RCU grace
> > periods which allow the structure being freed to age out of all relevant
> > caches?  (My guess would be the second.)
> 
> The issue are the RCU grace period that are generally long enough to make the
> cacheline fall out of all caches.

Would it make sense to push the freed-by-RCU memory further up the
hierarchy, so that such memory is not mistaken for recently freed
hot-in-cache memory?

							Thanx, Paul
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/