Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Friday, August 22, 2008 - 2:35 am

> We still need the equivalent functionality, though.  The midlayer 

Assuming you can actually have interrupts enabled at these point
and be otherwise ready to do call_function_simple (e.g. cpu hotplug
locking etc.) 

For a lot of MSR accesses in more complicated subsystems like cpufreq 
that requires complications.  I would think for many circumstances it's 
better to simply set affinity of the thread before at a higher level.

In hindsight I think it was my mistake to ever merge that.
I admit I never liked it, but just merged it because I wasn't able
to come up with a strong enough counter argument back then.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 sen ..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 22, 2:35 am)
Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 sen ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Aug 22, 11:42 pm)